vrijdag 27 november 2009
donderdag 26 november 2009
Immigration officials to audit 1,000 more companies
This audit is a two-pronged strategy. They want to tackle the companies hardly which recruit illegal immigrants. They reward also the companies which try to be honestly and use legal workers.
The government ask the American people to cooperate with the strategy. They want to introduce a label on the products of companies which doesn’t hire illegal immigrants, so that customers know they don’t buy products of dishonest companies. The strategy contains also a administrative obligation, if a company accept an employee, the employee has to fill in a special form to check whether the person is in order to recruit.
This is a strategy of president Obama. First he wants to examine the identity forms if there are irregularities. And if irregularities are found, the companies may then be fined for lax monitoring.
In the first audit there were 654 companies had been examined and 267 companies have to pay a penalty. But the consequence of this audit is that there are many discharges for example in a garment factory in downtown Los Angeles. After a federal audit turned up irregularities in identity documents of the workers. The consequence: about 1,800 immigrant employees are fired, that’s more than a quarter of its work force.
I think it’s a good idea to reward honest companies and to punish dishonest companies. Obama also use a very good strategy: to audit the firms and do no raids at the workplace which can avoid trauma’s and deportation. But if they do this audit there are also many illegal immigrants who will be fired like in the last example of the garment factory. I find it very terrible for those people who are dismissed. Maybe the government has to look first at the problem that there are many illegal immigrants. The government has to solve this problem first before auditing the companies.
Read the article.
woensdag 25 november 2009
Home Energy Audit
New Auditing Feature in Save-a-Deal 2010 Designed to Protect Dealerships From Fraud and Theft
I have chosen an aspect of auditing that not everyone is very familiar with.
Namely software. Automotive Software has come up with a new kind of software and services for the automotive retail industry.
A small overview of some new features. The most important aspect in software is to make sure that your data is secure. As of that: the security has 3 levels. The second aspect is speed. You get real-time access to up to 200,000 databases.
The main goal of the software is to give a report to provide finance managers with air-tight audits and unparalleled security.
Conclusion
If the software isn’t priced too high and when it actually works, I think it’s a great investment for all the dealerships. You have a good overview of all your shops.
source: http://www.cnbc.com/id/34106437/site/14081545
Fighting for a peaceful, pain-free death
People with cancer die a painful death. These people need to be put on the Liverpool Care Pathway. But a national audit revealed some lacks in its quality.
The terminally-ill persons are scared to be put on the LCP. This is a NHS palliative care program for patients who will die soon. This care program includes nutrition, hydration, and everything the person needs. And they also give them morphine and sedatives to stop the pain for a moment.
But in September, a group of doctors wrote to The Daily Telegraph. They said LCP caused a lot of deaths. For example, they don’t feed certain people. The same month, there has been a national audit. One of its results was that more than 25% of families didn’t know when a family member were put on the LCP.
Thanks to this audit, the architects of the LCP will give a revised version of the guidelines on Wednesday. One of the new guidelines, is that the family will know when their relatives will be put on the LCP.
According to some doctors, they do what’s best. So when they stop feeding the sick people, it’s due to inability to cope with the food and fluids. And If they continued to feed them, their lungs would waterlog. They say it’s just a misunderstanding. But the clinicians should be educated for some matters. For example, they shouldn’t give up op patients too quickly. Because there can always be a chance of surviving it.
I think, even if the terminally-ill person is dying, you should try to help him/her. The clinicians always keep in mind they’re very sick. So they don’t have any hope, which there actually is. Every individual is unique, which means they don’t react the same way. It would be better if they’d examine every person. I know it takes a lot of time. But it could save lives. In addition, I think it’s unbelievable that they don’t tell relatives when they moved onto the LCP. It’s still someone you love and respect. So they should at least give the information, the family needs. I’m glad they did this audit. Now, people think twice before they send their family member there.
Read the article here
donderdag 19 november 2009
Access audits for DDA
The main reason why the article caught my attention was because in my primary school my best friend was disabled: he used a wheelchair. To make sure he could safely move around there were little adaptations around the school premises. That's also what's mentioned in the article: it's not necessary to remove a building when it's not adapted. But it's possible to make the life of disabled people more easy by making some little changes in buildings that aren't adapted. And that's why I think it could be a good idea to audit buildings because it's not always easy to know what the difficulties are for people with a disability.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/ictcoach/accessibility/aad_p1.shtml
Were problems missed in rest home audit? Ministry checking
Due to the closure of an age-care facility in Palmerston North, the ministry of Health will look into the audit procedures. There has been an introducing of spot audits, so they will do the audit in general, for all the rest homes.
The audit came after a member of the Ros A Lea complained about the quality of the rest home. The worker, who has been in the industry for 21 years, told she wouldn’t even let her dog live there. But the Ministry said it was okay. Until the MidCentral District Health Board started its own audit, and closed it down.
There was one woman there, who was tied to her bed with a sheet. But she claims they took care of her, and that she has no complaints. In the mean while, she passed away. But her daughter claims she would have died several years ago, if she wasn’t in that rest home.
Thanks to what her family sais, the Aged Care Association doubts if the DHB did good, to close it down. Ros A Lea had a good reputation, until this incident happened. They think the DHB acted this cautious, due to the scandal of Auckland's Belhaven rest home, last year. But the DHB responds by saying there was no other choice, because they’ve breached the standards. At the time of the audit in March, the rest home didn’t have a warrant of fitness.
I think it was truly necessary to do this audit. As I read what the worker told about what happened there, I really felt sorry for the persons who live there. I mean, aged people need to be taken care of, very well. If this doesn’t happen as it should be, they can die. And I do think it’s strange that the DHB closed it down, but the Ministry of Health didn’t see anything wrong. I guess this tells a lot about the quality of the Ministry of Health..
read the article here